Development of a 21st Century Based Mathematics Learning Model: A Validity Study on the Investigation-Construction Stages
Alimuddin Tampa , Ja’faruddin , Muhammad Ikram , Andi Mulawakkan Firdaus
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and theoretically sound 21st century skills-based mathematics learning model. Plomp's research an.
- Pub. date: June 15, 2024
- Pages: 31-55
- 34 Downloads
- 143 Views
- 0 Citations
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and theoretically sound 21st century skills-based mathematics learning model. Plomp's research and development theory and Nieveen's criteria were used to ensure the quality and reliability of the model. The model development process includes Initial Investigation, Design, and Realization/Construction. Data were collected from six schools through various instruments such as observation sheets, documents, 21st century skills tests, and interview guides. Model validation involved the participation of five experts. A blended data analysis approach was used to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the findings. The result of this study is a 21st century skills-based mathematics learning model named Model 21-BML. The model consists of five interconnected core components: Learning Syntax, Social System, Reaction Principles, Support System, and Instructional and Accompanying Impacts. The uniqueness of this model lies in the seven integrated learning trajectories: Object translation, decomposition, cognitive construction, cognitive development, communication, reflection, and extension. After going through a rigorous validation process, the five experts confirmed the high validity of the 21-BML Model. This model not only enhances innovative mathematics learning theory, but also provides practical alternatives for mathematics teachers to encourage the development of 21st century skills in students. The model is expected to make a significant contribution in bridging the gap between traditional mathematics education and the competency demands of the modern era, as well.
21st bml 21st century skills mathematics learning model research and development rampampampampampd validity
Keywords: 21ST-BML, 21st century skills, mathematics learning model, research and development (R&D), validity.
0
References
Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., & Ariyani, F. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gifted students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.513308
Afriansyah, E. A., & Arwadi, F. (2021). Learning trajectory of quadrilateral applying realistic mathematics education: Origami-based tasks. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 42–78.
Agustina, E. N. S., Widadah, S., & Nisa, P. A. (2021). Developing realistic mathematics problems based on Sidoarjo local wisdom. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 181–201.
Ahdhianto, E., & Santi, N. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive-based contextual learning model on fifth-grade students' problem-solving and mathematical communication skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 753-764. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.753
Akgul, E. N., & Yilmaz, R. (2023). Secondary school students' construction processes of square root concept with realistic problems: An APOS perspective. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(1), 174–197.
Akib, E., & Muhsin, M. A. (2019). Assessment of teaching in 21st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179, Article 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012065
Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Díaz-García, I., & Orellana, N. (2020). Structure of 21st century competences in students in the sphere of education. Influential personal factors. Educacion XX1, 23(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.23853
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students' critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Banihashem, S. K. (2022). The impacts of constructivist learning design and learning analytics on students' engagement and self-regulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1890634
Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers' beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231–246. https://jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/1263
Benade, L. (2017). Being a teacher in the 21st century: A critical New Zealand research study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3782-5
Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers' 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51, 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
Bicer, A. (2021). A systematic literature review: Discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(2), 252–281. https://bit.ly/3z1m87T
Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/article/view/1254
Brown, G., & Desforges, C. (2013). Piaget's theory: A psychological critique. Routledge.
Budiman, T., & Franky, F. (2021). The relationship pattern of internet usage frequency, Generation Z characteristics, and teaching method in the millennium era. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(18), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i18.24555
Calhoun, E., Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2000). Models of teaching. Alyn and Bacon.
Care, E., Griffin, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2017). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications. Springer.
Chandrasoma, J., & Chu, L. F. (2016). Teaching the 21st century learner: Innovative strategies and practical implementation. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 54(3), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/aia.0000000000000108
Chang, B. (2019). Reflection in learning. Online Learning, 23(1), 95–110. https://bit.ly/3MD0NVl
Confrey, J., & Costa, S. (1996). A critique of the selection of "Mathematical objects" as a central metaphor for advanced mathematical thinking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571076
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning through reflection. In A. L. Costa & B. Kallick (Eds.), Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success (pp. 221–235). ASCD.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
D'Arco, M., Marino, V., & Resciniti, R. (2023). Exploring the pro-environmental behavioral intention of Generation Z in the tourism context: The role of injunctive social norms and personal norms. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2171049
Dariyono, D., & Rusman, R. (2023). Curriculum transformation in the 21st century education: Perspectives, challenges, and prospects. In Proceedings International Conference on Education Innovation and Social Science (pp. 57–68). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Dilekli, Y. (2020). Project-based learning. In R. Ş. Ergül & C. Alkan (Eds.), Paradigm shifts in 21st century teaching and learning (pp. 53–68). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3146-4.ch004
Donovan, L., Green, T. D., & Mason, C. (2014). Examining the 21st century classroom: Developing an innovation configuration map. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.2.a
Ellizar, E., Hardeli, H., Beltris, S., & Suharni, R. (2018). Development of scientific approach based on discovery learning module. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, Article 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012101
Felmer, P. (2023). Collaborative problem-solving in mathematics. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 52, Article 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101296
Gisbert Cervera, M., & Caena, F. (2022). Teachers' digital competence for global teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2135855
Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/curriculum-reform_efe8a48c-en
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Hartinah, S., Suherman, S., Syazali, M., Efendi, H., Junaidi, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Umam, R. (2019). Probing-prompting based on ethnomathematics learning model: The effect on mathematical communication skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.574275
Hidajat, F. A. (2021). Students creative thinking profile as a high order thinking in the improvement of mathematics learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1247-1258. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1247
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with under- standing. In D. A. Grouns (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-92). Macmillan,
Hilbert, M. (2020). Digital technology and social change: The digital transformation of society from a historical perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 189–194.
Ismail, S. N., Muhammad, S., Omar, M. N., & Shanmugam, K. S. (2022). The practice of critical thinking skills in teaching mathematics: Teachers' perception and readiness. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.1
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 785-811). Routledge.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson
Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students' critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141-1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
Khoiri, A., Evalina, Komariah, N., Utami, R. T., Paramarta, V., Siswandi, Janudin, & Sunarsi, D. (2021). 4Cs analysis of 21st century skills-based school areas. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764, Article 012142. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012142
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Kusumah, Y. S., Kustiawati, D., & Herman, T. (2020). The effect of GeoGebra in three-dimensional geometry learning on students' mathematical communication ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13260a
Magano, J., Silva, C. S., Figueiredo, C., Vitoria, A., & Nogueira, T. (2021). Project management in engineering education: Providing Generation Z with transferable skills. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3052496
Marlina, E. (2020). Pengembangan model pembelajaran blended learning berbantuan aplikasi Sevima Edlink. Jurnal Padegogik, 3(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i2.2339
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
Mitarlis, Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., & SutrisnoIbnu, S., & Rahayu, S. (2020). The effectiveness of new inquiry-based learning (NIBL) for improving multiple higher-order thinking skills (M-HOTS) of prospective chemistry teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1309-1325. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1309
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mopara, R., & Sanrattana, W. (2023). Developing teachers to develop students' 21st century skills. World Journal of Education, 13(3), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n3p94
Moreno, F. M., Lafuente, J. G., Carreón, F. Á., & Moreno, S. M. (2017). The characterization of the millennials and their buying behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(5), 135 -144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v9n5p135
Nafi'ah, B. (2020). STEM-PjBL based interactive multimedia design to stimulates mathematical critical thinking skills. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 1904–1916. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP7/20202303
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413
Nieminen, J. H., Chan, M. C. E., & Clarke, D. (2022). What affordances do open-ended real-life tasks offer for sharing student agency in collaborative problem-solving? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109, 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10074-9
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Nusantari, E., Abdul, A., Damopolii, I., Alghafri, A. S. R., & Bakkar, B. S. (2021). Combination of discovery learning and metacognitive knowledge strategy to enhance students' critical thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 1781-1791. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1781
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). What students learn matters: Towards a 21st century curriculum. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d86d4d9a-en
Pahrudin, A., Misbah, M., Alisia, G., Saregar, A., Asyhari, A., Anugrah, A., & Susilowati, N. E. (2021). The effectiveness of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics inquiry learning for 15-16 years old students based on K-13 Indonesian curriculum: The impact on the critical thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 681-692. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.681
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 9-36). SLO.
Putri, R. I. I. (2023). Web-based realistic mathematics learning environment for 21st-century skills in primary school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 253–274. https://bit.ly/4gkvaNO
Rahmi, S., Nadia, R., Hasibah, B., & Hidayat, W. (2017). The relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p177-182
Ramu, K., & Ramachandran, M. (2022). Application of mobile learning methods in the 21st century. Journal on Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 9-14.
Redmann, D. H., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2004). Analysis of technology integration in the teaching-learning process in selected career and technical education programs. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(1), 3–25. https://bit.ly/4cXAsfh
Rusdi, Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., & Lufri. (2020). Designing mathematics learning models based on realistic mathematics education and literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471, Article 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012055
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sa'id, I. A., Pambudi, D. S., Hobri, Safik, M., & Insani, K. (2021). Development of mathematics learning tools with Realistic Mathematics Education-Jumping Task (RME-JT) and its effect on the mathematic communication skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839, Article 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012018
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus, 22(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Setiawan, Y. (2020). Pengembangan model pembelajaran matematika SD berbasis permainan tradisional Indonesia dan pendekatan matematika realistik. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i1.p12-21
Sfard, A. (2012). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being—Or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 37–98). Routledge.
Shute, V. J., & Becker, B. J. (Eds.). (2010). Innovative assessment for the 21st century. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6530-1
Smith J. P., III, DiSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1466679
Spernes, K., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Scientific methods assignments as a basis for developing a profession-oriented inquiry-based learning approach in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928628
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. ZDM, 41, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. ASCD.
Sutama, S., Fuadi, D., Narimo, S., Hafida, S. H. N., Novitasari, M., Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., Sunanih, S., & Adnan, M. (2022). Collaborative mathematics learning management: Critical thinking skills in problem solving. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22193
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Syaifuddin, M. (2020). Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1491-1502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1491
Tall, D. (1995). Cognitive growth in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–61). Recife.
Tampa, A., Layly, S., Helmi, H., & Alimuddin, N. F. (2022). The students' numerical literacy ability in junior high schools. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 269–282. https://bit.ly/47lRq5P
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Urbani, J., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., & Truesdell, E. (2017). Developing and modeling 21st-century skills with preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(4), 27–50.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education-Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797
Wakhata, R., Balimuttajjo, S., & Mutarutinya, V. (2023). Building on students' prior mathematical thinking: Exploring students' reasoning interpretation of preconceptions in learning mathematics. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(1), 127–151.
Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The perceptions of teachers and students on a 21st century mathematics instructional model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 193–215. https://bit.ly/4dXAVj2
Watson, N. V., & Breedlove, S. M. (2018). The mind's machine: Foundations of brain and behavior. Sinauer Associates.
Wibowo, H. (2020). Pengantar teori-teori belajar dan model-model pembelajaran. Puri Cipta Media.
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom's taxonomy revised: Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. https://bit.ly/3Xy7Vsq
Winataputra, U. S. (2014). Hakikat belajar dan pembelajaran [The nature of learning and learning]. Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1–46. https://bit.ly/4cXdo0m
Yao, K., Zhang, L., Luo, T., & Wu, Y. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning for extractive document summarization. Neurocomputing, 284, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.01.020
Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020). Management of authentic assessment in mathematics lessons to develop 4C skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613, Article 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012050